No social order ever perishes before all the productive forces for which there is room in it have developed, and new higher relations of production never appear before the material conditions of their existence have matured in the womb of the old society.*
Certain Marxists in our country are known to have thought otherwise in the autumn of 1905. They considered a socialist revolution possible in Russia, since, they claimed, the country's productive forces were sufficiently developed for such a revolution. 38
- This assertion is typical of Plekhanov's Menshevik conception of the character and motive forces of the Russian revolution. Since he thought that in Russia the revolution would follow the pattern of the bourgeois revolutions in the West, Plekhanov, like most leaders of the Second International, held in the mistaken view that an entire period of world history must always separate the bourgeois revolution and the proletarian revolution. Lacking an understanding of the conditions of the new epoch - that of imperialism - Plekhanov thought that in Russia, a predominantly peasant country whose industrial development came later than elsewhere, the time was not yet ripe for a clash between the productive forces and the capitalist production relations. He therefore alleged that there were no objective condition for the socialist revolution.
Who was right in the end?
@C3535CE884D6EC075236back 116b5a36d23e6ae6230478a5cdf3948c4c7c400e875fb01113df208a6d2f659e
⎄ era stable
⎄ cosine similarity lock text similarity measure
⎄ cryptocryptics False
cipherlink 286af1dd036cbc38c6163d7f25ce5f77da94f4d4ae814ada98d1b775201f2b69